Methodology
How we research, source, and review
Trust is the whole point of this site. Here is exactly how the content is made, and where we are still building.
Sourcing
Every deep dive and digest entry links to authoritative or primary sources: government health bodies (NIH/NIA, CDC, NHLBI, NIDDK, NINDS, NCCIH), major professional organizations (the Alzheimer's Association, American Heart Association), the World Health Organization, MedlinePlus, and peer-reviewed studies via PubMed. We prefer the original study or guideline over secondary coverage.
Accuracy and link integrity
Claims are checked against the cited sources, and an automated test verifies that every citation URL still resolves. We distinguish what is well established from what is emerging or contested, and we state uncertainty plainly rather than rounding it away.
Independent medical review
Establishing review by a credentialed clinician is a priority. Until that process is formally in place, we do not display a "medically reviewed by" credential, because claiming a review that has not happened would be misleading. When a named reviewer and a dated, logged review process exist, we will say so here and on the relevant articles, and explain exactly what that review does and does not cover.
How AI is used
We use AI tools to help draft and edit, always with human review, source-checking, and editing before anything is published. AI is a writing aid, not the author of record, and it does not replace sourcing or human judgment.
Corrections
If we get something wrong, we fix it and note material changes. Spotted an error or a dead link? Tell us via the About page and we will look into it.
Not medical advice
Everything here is general education, not personalized medical advice. Decisions about your health belong with a qualified clinician who knows your full history.